Quote: Originally Posted by I am a Zither Zather Zuzz Why not just kill OSX all at once? Why this slow and painful transition to iOS on the desktop? Yeah, God forbid Apple create some consistency and high level of integration between their OSes. I'd be happy to pay for this if it were reasonable. Presumably Aperture would get similar iCloud based galleries, hopefully with pro templates for business use rather than home style ones. Though this could be the first MAS exclusive version, and therefore, be a paid upgrade for everyone, then be free updates in the future. In the MAS, I believe it is just iPhoto - though I could be wrong. Then again, they could pull the beam function to allow users to share that easy too. There has always been a school of thought that Apple really makes their money on the hardware not the software so I could see them just dropping the numbers and simply having iPhoto for Mac and this is another point release you get for free ĭead on. Especially since they have to buy again just to get the iOS version. I ask this because it would then require users to buy all over again and I'm not sure that Apple will do that. We can in effect do that via iCloud already so I'm not certain that Apple will be in a rush to add direct access in a 'wifi sync' kind of way. What I also question is if this will be a new version of the software. The only one that I question from their list is the notion of beaming photos from iOS to Mac. So if I want to 'paint' an effect on a photo I could do it on my iPad but it's the photo on the computer being changed. I even think we might find updates to both versions that would allow you to use your iPad or iPhone as a kind of touchscreen for the computer version. The features they are talking about, I think, are a given for an update. There has always been a school of thought that Apple really makes their money on the hardware not the software so I could see them just dropping the numbers and simply having iPhoto for Mac and this is another point release you get for free What I also question is if this will be a new version of the software. We can in effect do that via iCloud already so I'm not certain that Apple will be in a rush to add direct access in a 'wifi sync' kind of way. It was dubbed by Apple as a "reinvention" of the preexisting iPhoto for Mac. IPhoto for iOS was launched on the App Store in March, and was introduced alongside the third-generation iPad. The report also said that photo retouching in iPhoto '12 for Mac will be "inspired by iOS." It said the new version will be available on OS X 10.7 Lion or OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, but will not run on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard. In this way, users could quickly edit and share photos between their Mac and iOS devices. In addition, iPhoto '12 is also rumored to allow users to easily transfer pictures from iOS devices with iPhoto installed. This would replace the MobileMe gallery function currently found in iPhoto. The new iPhoto '12 will reportedly allow users to create a photo album and share it via iCloud. It said the new version the photo editing software will be "largely inspired" by the newly released iPhoto for iOS. The rumor comes from anonymous sources who spoke with the Dutch website Apple Weetjes, which does not have an extensive track record with respect to Apple rumors. A new rumor claims Apple is planning to release iPhoto '12 on the Mac App Store this summer, with the new software bringing some of the features of iPhoto for iOS to the Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |